You can trademark a sound? As long as it identifies your brand you can, but it isn't easy.

You Can Trademark a Sound?

Yes, sometimes a sound is so closely associated with a business or is intended to be such a brand identifier it can be trademarked.

To qualify to be registered as a trademark, the sound must be used or intended to be used as a brand identifier – something that consumers will hear and recognize as being connected with a particular brand and only that particular brand.

Sounds that can be registered include sounds that are purely instrumental or sound effects, purely vocals, or a combination of those.

There are some sounds that can’t be registered as trademarks, though, because sound trademarks are subject to the same requirements as “regular” word or design trademarks. To be registered, sounds must not be:

  • Generic or commonplace, like the sound of a train whistle or someone saying “car wash” in a plain voice, or
  • Purely functional, meaning they’re essential to how the goods/services are used or operate, like the sounds of a keyboard clacking when someone is typing.

Usually, sounds that can be registered as trademarks are fairly short. Something as long as a song is more appropriately protected through copyright registration.

Some examples of sound trademarks most everyone will recognize are:

It isn’t easy to get a sound registered as a trademark. Sometimes, copyright registration is the only available means of protection until the sound truly becomes instantly recognizable as tied to a brand. Using the services of a seasoned trademark attorney is recommended.

To learn more about our trademark services, go to https://kingpatentlaw.com/trademarks/

For some more sound trademark examples, check out https://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/soundmarks/trademark-sound-mark-examples

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.