Trademark Tales of Terror: Evil Dead – Not Just a Reference to Failed Trademarks

In this episode, we’re going to plunge into the eerie and tumultuous world of trademark lawsuits surrounding the iconic “Evil Dead” film franchise.

Join us as we navigate the macabre terrain of legal battles and the undead.  “Evil Dead,” the brainchild of director Sam Raimi, first graced the horror genre in 1981. The tale of a cursed book, demonic forces, and a chainsaw wielding hero, Ash Williams, became a cult classic and established the franchise’s dark legacy.

But beyond the screams and gore, the “Evil Dead” series has also seen its fair share of legal turmoil.  One of the most notable trademark lawsuits  One of the most notable trademark lawsuits regarding the film series occurred in 2018 when Renaissance Pictures, the production company behind the franchise, filed a lawsuit against Award Pictures Incorporated. Award Pictures had released a film titled “Evil Dead,” claiming that it was a public domain movie unrelated to the original franchise.

Renaissance Pictures vehemently disagreed, arguing that the title and marketing of the film misled consumers into thinking it was a legitimate “Evil Dead” installment.  Renaissance Pictures also needed to take action against this film name because one of the things you have to do when you have a trademark is police it, which means that you have to take action to stop infringement by other parties.

And if you don’t, you can actually start to lose some of your rights.  This lawsuit was a fierce battle between the two parties, with Renaissance Pictures seeking to protect the “Evil Dead” trademark and maintain its rights over the franchise. In the end, the court ruled in favor of Renaissance Pictures, emphasizing the potential confusion among consumers and the potential harm to the established franchise.

The “Evil Dead” trademark lawsuit serves as a reminder that the world of intellectual property is not immune to the forces of darkness. The franchise’s enduring popularity has made it a target for those looking to capitalize on its name.

In the end, the chainsaw wielding spirit of Ash Williams, along with the legal guardians of the “Evil Dead” franchise, continue to fight against those who seek to exploit its legacy.

If you’d like me to do an episode on any other horror-related trademarks, send me a suggestion and I’ll see if I can concoct a twisted tale for you.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.