Trade Dress Trademarks Vs Design Patents, And How Functionality Can Destroy Both

What Design Patents Have That Trade Dress Trademarks Don’t

Early Application and Enforcement

One big advantage of a design patent is timing: You can file this application immediately upon finalizing the design. That’s not the case with trade dress protection.

This allows you to fend off direct copiers while you build your brand. Usually, design patents are issued within 2 years of the application date, but the protection is retroactive to the application date if you use “patent pending” on the product and if your patent is granted.

Usefulness Isn’t Always a Problem

Unlike trade dress trademark applications, a design patent application won’t necessarily be rejected just because the look also affects how the product functions, as long as that functionality isn’t essential to how the product works. If there are a variety of other designs for the product that can achieve the same function, the design is probably suitable for a design patent.

Simpler Requirement

Design patents do not require proof of consumer recognition or acquired distinctiveness. You just have to show the design is new and non-obvious.

What Trade Dress Trademarks Have That Design Patents Don’t

  • Term: Protection can last indefinitely, as long as you continue to use the mark, defend the mark, and submit the maintenance documents and fees to the USPTO.
  • Source Identifier: It lives on because consumers know the design means a product from you.

The Biggest Obstacles: Functionality and Time

Trade dress has two strict requirements that make it a long-term goal:

  1. Strict Non-Functionality: The look must be non-functional. This is much more restrictive than the requirements for a design patent. If the design is essential to how the product works, or if you have a utility patent covering part of the design, it will generally not qualify for trade dress protection. For a design patent, the design can be useful; it just can’t be the only way the product works.
  2. Acquired Distinctiveness: Before you can register a trade dress trademark, the design must be used in commerce, which means it has to be available to the public, and it must develop secondary meaning, which means the public associates the design itself with your company, even without a logo or name. This process can take years. Consumers instantly know the Coke bottle shape means a Coca-Cola product because the shape has come to be identified with Coke products, but that didn’t happen overnight. This requirement is different from how name, logo, and slogan trademarks work.

A design patent can be a great start to protecting the look of your product, but a trade dress trademark is the best long-term protection. If the design is also functional, though, you may not be able to get a design patent for it, and you definitely won’t be able to get a trade dress trademark for it.

Intellectual property is one of your most powerful business tools. If you’re ready to build a strong brand and protect what you create, you don’t have to figure it out alone.

I help entrepreneurs across the U.S. make smart, legally sound decisions about their intellectual property. I’m an attorney in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, but I serve intellectual property clients nationwide.

Ready to protect your work? Book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or call 217-714-8558.

For more information on intellectual property and business law, check out the other posts on this site, listen to my podcast “Spellbinding IP: Patent, Trademark, and Business Strategy” on all major podcast platforms (video available on YouTube, Spotify, and Substack), or follow me on social media at @kingpatentlaw.

Avoid the legal horrors, and keep rocking your IP.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.