The Infernal Deepfake Influencer Imitation

The unauthorized use of artificial intelligence, or AI, to clone or duplicate a celebrity’s likeness, particularly their voice or image, often called a deepfake or digital replica, has led to a rapid but fragmented legal response. Because no single federal statute directly addresses this issue yet, the legal battle is being fought primarily under state-level right of publicity laws.

Tennessee, home to many entertainers, enacted that wonderfully named ELVIS Act, which is short for the Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act, which updated its right of publicity law to protect an individual’s voice from unauthorized AI simulation. Similarly, California has passed new legislation aimed at protecting digital likenesses of performers.

Federally, legislation like the proposed No Fakes Act has been introduced in Congress to create a national harmonized federal right of publicity that specifically covers digital replicas. In the courts, claims often combine state right of publicity laws with federal Lanham Act claims for false endorsement or passing off and breach of contract, highlighting that for now, the strongest protections are found in state statutes and precisely drafted contracts.

Here’s a key takeaway.

Do not let a contract give the brand or the influencer the power to tarnish the goodwill you’ve built into your personal brand or business brand. Ensure any use of your name, likeness, or voice is strictly limited to the agreed-upon campaign and that your right to protect your reputation is preserved. Make sure there are explicit provisions about the use of AI to replicate your image, voice, etc.

Navigating brand partnerships doesn’t have to be terrifying. If you’re a small business or hiring a marketing team or agency or using influencer marketing, or if you’re a creative entrepreneur signing your first or your 20th brand deal, remember this.

The horror contracts are usually the ones you sign without having a thorough review.

Having an attorney review these clauses, specifically the IP ownership, disclosure, indemnity, and right of publicity sections, is an investment that protects the commercial value of everything you’ve worked hard to create and makes it clear who has the rights to what going forward. Whether you’re the creator or the brand, it’s important to spend the time and money to make sure the contracts give you the proper protection, because the contracts are often the only thing standing between a profitable collaboration and a legal nightmare.

Intellectual property is one of the most terrifyingly useful tools you have. If you’re a creator or other entrepreneur ready to build a frighteningly powerful brand and business, you need to know how to use it. You don’t have to face the darkness alone, though.

I help entrepreneurs across the U.S. make smart, legally sound decisions about their intellectual property. I’m an attorney in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, but I serve intellectual property clients nationwide.

If you’d like to consult with me, please book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on intellectual property and business law issues. I’m also on most major podcast platforms as “Know Your Rights: Your Intellectual Property and Business Law Playbook” (video on YouTube, Spotify, and Substack only) and on most social media as @kingpatentlaw.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Applications Decoded

Tales from the Crypt(ic Requirements): Trademark Specimens and Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications Decoded

Thinking about filing a trademark before you launch? Intent-to-Use applications and specimen requirements are more complex than they appear. Patent attorney Julie King explains what goes wrong and why trademark attorney guidance matters. You’ve got a great brand name. Maybe you’ve designed a logo. You’re getting ready to launch your business or product. But here’s the question everyone asks: Should you wait until you’re actually selling products to file for a trademark? Or can you file now and secure your rights before launch?

Trump trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

Current Events: Trump Trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

How Trump Business Ownership of Airport Trademarks Would Violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause: How does the Domestic Emoluments Clause apply to these trademark applications? Who names airports? That’s right, Congress does, for airports under federal jurisdiction, and the states do for state-owned airports.
Trump has asked for the Palm Beach International Airport and Dulles International Airport to be named after him. Given that these applications also cover airport construction, it’s not a leap to think there may be future airports Trump wants to be named “DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT” and/or “PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,” especially if the proposed renaming of the Palm Beach and Dulles airports doesn’t happen. Note that the trademarks for the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport are owned by the public entity that runs the airport, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Federal Agency Assignee of United States (D.C. Body Politic and Corporate) ), NOT a private company.