Protecting Your Brand, Name, Likeness, and Voice from the Reputational Whirlpool

The creator’s greatest asset, often more valuable than any single video, is their personal brand: their name, voice, signature look, and unique style. This is protected by the overlapping areas of trademark law and the right of publicity.

A trademark protects your brand, source, and identity. For example, your podcast title, your logo, or your unique clothing line name. Even if you haven’t registered the trademark with the USPTO or your state, you do have some common law trademark rights. They’re just pretty weak. Registration with the USPTO, when it’s possible, and it’s not always possible, gives you the most enforcement rights and the ability to maximize a judgment against an infringer.

The right of publicity is a state-based right that gives every person, especially celebrities and influencers, the right to control the commercial use of their name, likeness, image, voice, and other identifying characteristics. Now, it doesn’t usually provide any protection for news, parodies, or public interest use. Since it is dependent on state laws, the exact rights vary from state to state.

Here’s the contract trap:

If an influencer contract is too broad, it might grant the brand rights that undermine the influencer’s own brand. For example, the contract might allow the brand to exclusively edit the content in a way that damages the influencer’s reputation or give the brand the right to use the influencer’s name or likeness in unrelated future marketing materials, without a separate fee or review by the influencer.

An influencer successfully suing a brand specifically for misappropriating the influencer’s own trademarked catchphrase or brand name and passing it off as their own is still an evolving area.

While people often think that trademark law just covers words and symbols, trademark law also protects trade dress, which is about the overall commercial image or total look of a product or service. The classic Coca-Cola bottle shape is a great example of trade dress.

For creative entrepreneurs, the unique aesthetic of the brand is a critical asset that must be protected, often requiring registration of copyrights and trademarks and the strategic use of trade dress law.

Intellectual property is one of your most powerful business tools. If you’re ready to build a strong brand and protect what you create, you don’t have to figure it out alone.

I help entrepreneurs across the U.S. make smart, legally sound decisions about their intellectual property. I’m an attorney in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, but I serve intellectual property clients nationwide.

Ready to protect your work? Book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or call 217-714-8558.

For more information on intellectual property and business law, check out the other posts on this site, listen to my podcast “Spellbinding IP: Patent, Trademark, and Business Strategy” on all major podcast platforms (video available on YouTube, Spotify, and Substack), or follow me on social media at @kingpatentlaw.

Avoid the legal horrors, and keep rocking your IP.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Applications Decoded

Tales from the Crypt(ic Requirements): Trademark Specimens and Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications Decoded

Thinking about filing a trademark before you launch? Intent-to-Use applications and specimen requirements are more complex than they appear. Patent attorney Julie King explains what goes wrong and why trademark attorney guidance matters. You’ve got a great brand name. Maybe you’ve designed a logo. You’re getting ready to launch your business or product. But here’s the question everyone asks: Should you wait until you’re actually selling products to file for a trademark? Or can you file now and secure your rights before launch?

Trump trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

Current Events: Trump Trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

How Trump Business Ownership of Airport Trademarks Would Violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause: How does the Domestic Emoluments Clause apply to these trademark applications? Who names airports? That’s right, Congress does, for airports under federal jurisdiction, and the states do for state-owned airports.
Trump has asked for the Palm Beach International Airport and Dulles International Airport to be named after him. Given that these applications also cover airport construction, it’s not a leap to think there may be future airports Trump wants to be named “DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT” and/or “PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,” especially if the proposed renaming of the Palm Beach and Dulles airports doesn’t happen. Note that the trademarks for the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport are owned by the public entity that runs the airport, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Federal Agency Assignee of United States (D.C. Body Politic and Corporate) ), NOT a private company.