Patent Sin #5. Impersonation: Using Generative AI and Claiming You’re the Inventor

The Horror: Using an AI Tool to Help You “Invent” and Claiming You’re the Inventor for the Parts it “Invented”

With the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted inventions, the rules around inventorship are more crucial than ever.

  • The Rule (per Updated USPTO Guidance, November 2025): Only natural persons (human beings) can be inventors or joint inventors on U.S. patent applications.
  • The Tool: AI systems, including generative AI, are explicitly treated as tools by patent law, like laboratory equipment or software. They may assist in the inventive process, but they cannot legally conceive the invention.
  • The Fatalities:
    • Rejection. Applications listing an AI system or other non-natural “person” as an inventor will be rejected under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 115. If you’re claiming priority to a foreign application, there must be at least one human in common with that application and your application.
    • Invalidation. While the USPTO examiners may not look into which parts were invented by a human and which were created by AI, if a dispute over the patent ever arises, you can bet opposing counsel will look into it to try to prove the patent is unenforceable or invalid.

Actionable Takeaway

Always document the human-driven conception: how the natural person selected, specified, and integrated the AI-identified features into the claimed solution. It’s important to keep good notes about your inventive process no matter what, but if you’re using AI to help you, document that and how you had it assist you! Print/download your AI use history/conversations for your records.

Intellectual property is one of the most terrifyingly useful tools you have. If you’re a creator or other entrepreneur ready to build a frighteningly powerful brand and business, you need to know how to use it. You don’t have to face the darkness alone, though.

I help entrepreneurs across the U.S. make smart, legally sound decisions about their intellectual property. I’m an attorney in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, but I serve intellectual property clients nationwide.

If you’d like to consult with me, please book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on intellectual property and business law issues. I’m also on most major podcast platforms as “Know Your Rights: Your Intellectual Property and Business Law Playbook” (video on YouTube, Spotify, and Substack only) and on most social media as @kingpatentlaw.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.