Patent Inventorship vs. Ownership – What You Need to Know

Did you know that just because you invent something, you might not own the patent? Let’s break down the difference between inventorship and ownership in patents—and why it matters for your business!

⚙⚖ Inventorship vs. Ownership

Inventorship is about who actually came up with the invention, while ownership determines who controls the patent rights. And yes, they can be different!

  • In many situations, the inventor is also the initial owner of the rights to the invention as they relate to applying for and being granted patent rights.
  • However, if you invent something as an employee, and sometimes as an independent contractor, your employer may own it—depending on your contract. Sometimes this will apply to works created on company time, on the company premises, or using company equipment, even if they aren’t related to company business. Even if ownership is assigned in this way to the business, the inventor remains the inventor. This is different than the work-for-hire situation with copyright rights.
    • Businesses should make sure employment and contractor agreements make the terms of ownership clear.
    • Employees and contractors should look carefully at their agreements so they aren’t surprised about ownership rights.
  • Other than as just described, all co-inventors share ownership rights unless they transfer ownership.
  • Invention rights not otherwise owned by a company can be assigned to a company, shifting ownership from the inventor to the business.

📃 Assigning & Licensing Patent Rights

If you own the patent rights personally, you can allow your business to use the rights in one of two ways:

  • License them to your business. This allows the business to make use of the patent rights while you retain ownership.
  • Assign them to your business. If you decide to transfer all ownership of the patent rights to the business, you’ll need to assign those rights through a formal transfer. Assignment of rights through a section in an employment or contractor agreement is how businesses are given rights to inventions by employees or contractors.

Whether you want to license or assign your rights, a written agreement is necessary to state clearly what rights are granted or transferred, and under what circumstances.

Which option is right for you and your business? Of course, it depends. Like with any intellectual property, investors in and buyers of a business prefer to have ownership by the business. Your goals as an individual may be different, though.

🗝 Key Takeaway:

Patents are valuable assets, but ownership isn’t always as simple as it seems. The inventor is always the inventor, but the inventor is often not also the owner of the patent rights. Need help sorting it out? Talk to a patent attorney! Don’t forget to subscribe for more IP legal insights!

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.