No Fun: The Cheap Online Trademark Service Trap

Who doesn’t like to save money? I get it. I like a good bargain, too. I see the appeal of the online platforms like LegalZoom, Trademark Engine, and similar services that advertise cheap and fast trademark searches and filing. But here’s what they don’t tell you, or what’s buried in the fine print no one reads, based on what I’ve personally seen happen to clients who started with them:

  • Their “searches” are usually automated only – no manual searching is done.
  • You typically don’t get legal analysis of the results, just a printout of what the AI search found. At best you get a “ranked” results list that doesn’t come with advice. If a potential conflict shows up, they often don’t tell you whether it’s a legitimate concern or how much of a problem it could be. You’re often still responsible for interpreting the results—and for the consequences.
  • They won’t tell you before doing the search if the search isn’t worth doing because your mark is ineligible for registration for one of the many reasons an application may be denied.

Note that I know these things because my clients didn’t feel confident in the service they got from an online service, so they then hired me to do the job properly.

Most of these online services are not law firms, meaning they don’t and can’t represent you before the USPTO after they file your application. The ones that do offer limited scope legal services have the equivalent of fast-food prices in the legal world. Ask yourself why that is. In other words, relying on the cheap online services is like using WebMD to see if your symptoms are signs of heart failure. You might get the right answer . . . or you might miss something big and potentially fatal.

If you’re launching, growing, or just unsure whether your business/brand name or your logo are truly protected, let’s talk. I help entrepreneurs across the U.S. make smart, legally sound decisions about names and logos.

If you’d like to consult with me, you can use my contact form or book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on trademarks and other intellectual property and business law issues.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Applications Decoded

Tales from the Crypt(ic Requirements): Trademark Specimens and Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications Decoded

Thinking about filing a trademark before you launch? Intent-to-Use applications and specimen requirements are more complex than they appear. Patent attorney Julie King explains what goes wrong and why trademark attorney guidance matters. You’ve got a great brand name. Maybe you’ve designed a logo. You’re getting ready to launch your business or product. But here’s the question everyone asks: Should you wait until you’re actually selling products to file for a trademark? Or can you file now and secure your rights before launch?

Trump trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

Current Events: Trump Trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

How Trump Business Ownership of Airport Trademarks Would Violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause: How does the Domestic Emoluments Clause apply to these trademark applications? Who names airports? That’s right, Congress does, for airports under federal jurisdiction, and the states do for state-owned airports.
Trump has asked for the Palm Beach International Airport and Dulles International Airport to be named after him. Given that these applications also cover airport construction, it’s not a leap to think there may be future airports Trump wants to be named “DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT” and/or “PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,” especially if the proposed renaming of the Palm Beach and Dulles airports doesn’t happen. Note that the trademarks for the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport are owned by the public entity that runs the airport, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Federal Agency Assignee of United States (D.C. Body Politic and Corporate) ), NOT a private company.