Is Your Invention or Idea Inventive Enough to Patent?

You have a groundbreaking invention—but how do you know if it’s truly innovative enough for a patent?

Are you 100% certain no one anywhere in the world has had the same idea and made it public in any way? I’ve had clients think they were that certain, only to find out the hard way they were wrong.

Why does it matter whether you’re the only one to have your amazing idea?

You Want Patentability and You DON’T Want to Infringe

Here’s what is required to obtain a patent AND be sure you’re not infringing on someone else’s patent:

  1. Novelty – It must be new, meaning no one has publicly disclosed the same idea before you also came up with it.
  2. Non-Obviousness – It can’t be an obvious improvement of an existing invention. This can be a bit subjective, but an example is trying to get a patent for a robotic cat when there is already a nearly identical robot dog or making a robot dog that barks also growl.
  3. Usefulness – It must have a real-world application, meaning it has to work. It can’t be an idea for something that’s impossible to make or do.

There are additional nuances, but those are the essential requirements.

How Do You Find Out if Your Invention is Sufficiently Innovative?

Like with trademarks, you search. For patents, you are presumed to know about the state of the art in the field of the invention. That means if someone anywhere in the world has a patent,  published patent application, journal article, trade show exhibit, listing on Amazon, or any other public appearance or mention of something that could keep your invention from being considered innovative, it’s called “prior art,”  you are presumed to know about it, and it can and will be used against you.

If you don’t want to risk being wrong about your invention being unique and innovative, having a professional patentability search done is a smart idea.

If you might not apply for a patent but want to be sure you’re not infringing on someone else’s patent, a freedom-to-operate search is a great idea.

Why a Patent Attorney Search is Worth It

  1. Comprehensive Patent Databases – The USPTO patent database and Google Patents are good starting points, but professional patent searches go beyond these.
  2. International Considerations – A patent search needs to cover global prior art, as international publications can impact your rights, as I mentioned previously.
  3. Legal Strategy – DIY searches might miss nuances that an experienced patent attorney would catch. Some online services provide surface-level searches, but they don’t analyze whether your idea is truly patentable or how to draft strong claims that withstand challenges. For example, LegalZoom only searches the USPTO database, and you know from what I’ve said earlier that isn’t nearly sufficient.

Hiring a patent attorney to conduct a professional search can make or break your application and save you from doing something almost guaranteed to get you accused of infringement. The upfront investment is far cheaper than discovering a competitor’s patent after you’ve already spent time and money developing your invention!

If you found this useful, please like and subscribe to get regular tips on navigating intellectual property and business law issues!

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.