Helpful Illinois Updates about Using a Small Estate Affidavit vs Probate Court for an Estate

Helpful Illinois Updates About Using a Small Estate Affidavit vs Probate Court for an Estate

The Illinois Legislature and Governor Pritzker signed a law recently that makes some big and helpful changes to when you can use a Small Estate Affidavit to handle a decedent’s estate rather than having to go through probate court!

Here’s what has changed:

  1. The eligibility threshold to use a Small Estate Affidavit increased. It used to be if the total estate value was under $100,000. Now it’s $150,000.
  2. Making this even better is the total estate value now EXCLUDES vehicles.

This will spare a sizeable number of people from having to go through probate court when someone dies. However, this will only be the most effective if someone has done good planning to keep the value of their estate under the $150,000 threshold. 

The requirement that if a decedent owned any real estate valued at over $2500, that real estate must be handled through probate court has not changed. Trusts or transfer-on-death instruments (deeds) can help prevent this from being an issue.

With these changes, it’s a good time to check in with an estate planning attorney to see if your plan needs to be changed, or start working with an estate planning attorney if you haven’t yet. They may be able to help you take advantage of these changes and other tools to save your beneficiaries the time and expense of going through probate court to handle your estate.

  •  
Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.