Common DIY Provisional Patent Application Mistakes: Failing to Include Drawings or Diagrams

Legally, drawings aren’t required for a provisional patent application to get a filing date. However, they ARE required if they are necessary for understanding the invention. Drawings and diagrams help explain what your invention looks like and how it functions, especially when text falls short.

They can’t just be haphazard, either, if you want them to count when it’s time for the non-provisional application.

Just because drawings aren’t required for a provisional application to get a filing date doesn’t mean they can’t make or break your non-provisional application.

Why Does This Matter?

Visuals help clarify your invention and can fill in gaps where words fall short. They also help show key components and functionality. Even a basic hand-drawn sketch can make your disclosure more complete. If you later need to prove you disclosed a certain feature, your drawings might be the only evidence that saves you. If something isn’t covered in the description or the drawings, it would be “new matter” in the non-provisional application, and I described in an earlier post why that’s bad.

Here’s How to Avoid this Mistake

Include clear sketches, CAD files, or hand drawings. Include labeled parts, multiple angles, or flowcharts if your invention involves processes. If the parts or steps are there in a non-formal drawing for the provisional application, the drawing can be cleaned up to comply with USPTO drawing rules for the non-provisional application. Assume the people reading the application have no imagination and show in addition to telling. Even basic visuals can go a long way.

Working with a patent attorney can put you in touch with patent artists who know how to comply with USPTO requirements, and can show you what drawings are needed to make the application make sense to someone who isn’t familiar yet with the invention.

If you’d like help with a patent, let’s talk. You can use my contact form or book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on patents and other intellectual property and business law issues.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.