Copyright Horror: Did a Siren’s Song Make You Sign Away Your Content Forever?

When a creator, influencer, or filmmaker produces a piece of content for a brand, such as a video, a custom song, a photo, or an edit, the key question is: Who owns the finished work?

The law provides two main paths for a brand to obtain rights to content.

1. Copyright Assignment or Licensing

Copyright assignment or licensing is the transfer of ownership or permission to use. This is the most common way ownership of copyright rights is handled between a business and an influencer or marketing agency. That relationship is defined by those contract terms, and those terms include how copyright rights will be handled.

An assignment is used when the creator initially owns the copyright, but then transfers all of the ownership rights to the brand in assigned writing, such as a clause in the contract. In marketing service deals, while the creator is still the author, the ownership of the work is assigned through the terms in the service contract to the business who contracted with the marketing agency to have the work done.

A license is used when the creator keeps ownership of the content but grants the other person or business permission to use it under specific conditions. In many influencer deals, the influencer is the default owner and the brand is granted a broad license through the service contract to use the work created by the influencer. The contract may also include restrictions on how the influencer can use the content they own in order to protect the reputation of the brand.

2. Work Made for Hire

This is less common because the rules are strict. There are two ways a copyrighted work can be a work made for hire or work for hire as it’s more commonly known. 

The first is when someone is in an employer-employee relationship and the work was created as part of the employee’s regular duties, it’s a work for hire and the employer is legally the author and the owner. The employee has no rights to it.

The second is when the work was ordered or commissioned by someone and it meets strict guidelines. Three things must be true.

  1. The parties must sign a written agreement.
  2. The written agreement must explicitly say it is a work made for hire.
  3. Third, the work must fall into one of the nine specific categories defined in the Copyright Act.

If any of those requirements are missed, the work is not a work made for hire and the creator is still the author and the ownership is decided by the contract.

Intellectual property is one of the most terrifyingly useful tools you have. If you’re a creator or other entrepreneur ready to build a frighteningly powerful brand and business, you need to know how to use it. You don’t have to face the darkness alone, though.

I help entrepreneurs across the U.S. make smart, legally sound decisions about their intellectual property. I’m an attorney in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, but I serve intellectual property clients nationwide.

If you’d like to consult with me, please book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on intellectual property and business law issues. I’m also on most major podcast platforms as “Know Your Rights: Your Intellectual Property and Business Law Playbook” (video on YouTube, Spotify, and Substack only) and on most social media as @kingpatentlaw.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.