Copyright Horror: Did a Siren’s Song Make You Sign Away Your Content Forever?

When a creator, influencer, or filmmaker produces a piece of content for a brand, such as a video, a custom song, a photo, or an edit, the key question is: Who owns the finished work?

The law provides two main paths for a brand to obtain rights to content.

1. Copyright Assignment or Licensing

Copyright assignment or licensing is the transfer of ownership or permission to use. This is the most common way ownership of copyright rights is handled between a business and an influencer or marketing agency. That relationship is defined by those contract terms, and those terms include how copyright rights will be handled.

An assignment is used when the creator initially owns the copyright, but then transfers all of the ownership rights to the brand in assigned writing, such as a clause in the contract. In marketing service deals, while the creator is still the author, the ownership of the work is assigned through the terms in the service contract to the business who contracted with the marketing agency to have the work done.

A license is used when the creator keeps ownership of the content but grants the other person or business permission to use it under specific conditions. In many influencer deals, the influencer is the default owner and the brand is granted a broad license through the service contract to use the work created by the influencer. The contract may also include restrictions on how the influencer can use the content they own in order to protect the reputation of the brand.

2. Work Made for Hire

This is less common because the rules are strict. There are two ways a copyrighted work can be a work made for hire or work for hire as it’s more commonly known. 

The first is when someone is in an employer-employee relationship and the work was created as part of the employee’s regular duties, it’s a work for hire and the employer is legally the author and the owner. The employee has no rights to it.

The second is when the work was ordered or commissioned by someone and it meets strict guidelines. Three things must be true.

  1. The parties must sign a written agreement.
  2. The written agreement must explicitly say it is a work made for hire.
  3. Third, the work must fall into one of the nine specific categories defined in the Copyright Act.

If any of those requirements are missed, the work is not a work made for hire and the creator is still the author and the ownership is decided by the contract.

Intellectual property is one of the most terrifyingly useful tools you have. If you’re a creator or other entrepreneur ready to build a frighteningly powerful brand and business, you need to know how to use it. You don’t have to face the darkness alone, though.

I help entrepreneurs across the U.S. make smart, legally sound decisions about their intellectual property. I’m an attorney in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, but I serve intellectual property clients nationwide.

If you’d like to consult with me, please book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on intellectual property and business law issues. I’m also on most major podcast platforms as “Know Your Rights: Your Intellectual Property and Business Law Playbook” (video on YouTube, Spotify, and Substack only) and on most social media as @kingpatentlaw.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Applications Decoded

Tales from the Crypt(ic Requirements): Trademark Specimens and Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications Decoded

Thinking about filing a trademark before you launch? Intent-to-Use applications and specimen requirements are more complex than they appear. Patent attorney Julie King explains what goes wrong and why trademark attorney guidance matters. You’ve got a great brand name. Maybe you’ve designed a logo. You’re getting ready to launch your business or product. But here’s the question everyone asks: Should you wait until you’re actually selling products to file for a trademark? Or can you file now and secure your rights before launch?

Trump trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

Current Events: Trump Trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

How Trump Business Ownership of Airport Trademarks Would Violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause: How does the Domestic Emoluments Clause apply to these trademark applications? Who names airports? That’s right, Congress does, for airports under federal jurisdiction, and the states do for state-owned airports.
Trump has asked for the Palm Beach International Airport and Dulles International Airport to be named after him. Given that these applications also cover airport construction, it’s not a leap to think there may be future airports Trump wants to be named “DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT” and/or “PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,” especially if the proposed renaming of the Palm Beach and Dulles airports doesn’t happen. Note that the trademarks for the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport are owned by the public entity that runs the airport, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Federal Agency Assignee of United States (D.C. Body Politic and Corporate) ), NOT a private company.