Bad Influence: Don’t Ignore the FTC’s Rules About Transparency and Disclosures for Influencer Marketing

Like with intellectual property issues, the consequences of getting the legal details about transparency and disclosure wrong can be terrifying. In this case, they can include fines, class action lawsuits, and the destruction of consumer trust. The Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, enforces the law that prohibits unfair and deceptive acts or practices, which includes misleading advertising.

The rule is simple. If there is a material connection between the brand and the endorser or the influencer, that connection must be must be clearly and conspicuously shown. A material connection is anything that might affect the weight or credibility of the endorsement: cash, free product, loans, or family relationships.

By law, it is permissible to pay an influencer to endorse your product. However, It is legally required to show that paid relationship.

While some platforms have built-in disclosure tools, those aren’t always sufficient. The FTC’s focus is on whether the disclosure is clear and conspicuous. Hiding the disclosure behind a “see more” link, burying it in a block of 30 other hashtags, or using ambiguous terms like #collab or #partner, are legal mistakes that whether they were made on purpose or accidentally are considered a deceptive act under the law. The FTC doesn’t care if you didn’t know the law.

Here’s a case example. The FTC has taken law enforcement actions against brands like Lord & Taylor and the American Beverage Association and their influencers for non-disclosure. Class action lawsuits filed just this year against major brands such as Shein and Celsius and their influencers show that private plaintiffs are also targeting these issues, seeking massive damages if non-disclosure is proven to misled consumers.

Here’s a key takeaway for both brands and creators. Always make sure your disclosure is unambiguous and impossible to miss. Use clear terms like #ad or #sponsored at the very top of the caption or superimposed clearly on a video.

Intellectual property is one of the most terrifyingly useful tools you have. If you’re a creator or other entrepreneur ready to build a frighteningly powerful brand and business, you need to know how to use it. You don’t have to face the darkness alone, though.

I help entrepreneurs across the U.S. make smart, legally sound decisions about their intellectual property. I’m an attorney in Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, but I serve intellectual property clients nationwide.

If you’d like to consult with me, please book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on intellectual property and business law issues. I’m also on most major podcast platforms as “Know Your Rights: Your Intellectual Property and Business Law Playbook” (video on YouTube, Spotify, and Substack only) and on most social media as @kingpatentlaw.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Applications Decoded

Tales from the Crypt(ic Requirements): Trademark Specimens and Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications Decoded

Thinking about filing a trademark before you launch? Intent-to-Use applications and specimen requirements are more complex than they appear. Patent attorney Julie King explains what goes wrong and why trademark attorney guidance matters. You’ve got a great brand name. Maybe you’ve designed a logo. You’re getting ready to launch your business or product. But here’s the question everyone asks: Should you wait until you’re actually selling products to file for a trademark? Or can you file now and secure your rights before launch?

Trump trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

Current Events: Trump Trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

How Trump Business Ownership of Airport Trademarks Would Violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause: How does the Domestic Emoluments Clause apply to these trademark applications? Who names airports? That’s right, Congress does, for airports under federal jurisdiction, and the states do for state-owned airports.
Trump has asked for the Palm Beach International Airport and Dulles International Airport to be named after him. Given that these applications also cover airport construction, it’s not a leap to think there may be future airports Trump wants to be named “DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT” and/or “PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,” especially if the proposed renaming of the Palm Beach and Dulles airports doesn’t happen. Note that the trademarks for the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport are owned by the public entity that runs the airport, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Federal Agency Assignee of United States (D.C. Body Politic and Corporate) ), NOT a private company.