Myth: “A Provisional Patent Application Gives Me a Patent”

#1 of 5 Common Misconceptions About Provisional Patent Applications

Nope! A provisional patent application is not a patent. Based on inventor questions I see on Reddit and Quora, inventors should have to write this on the whiteboard 100 times before filing a provisional patent application.

Here's the Truth

A provisional patent application is essentially a temporary filing that holds your place in line at the USPTO for 12 months. To get an actual patent, you must file a non-provisional application before that year runs out. The USPTO does NOT examine your provisional application, and it will never result in a patent on its own.

While a provisional application establishes an early filing priority date for your invention and allows you to use “patent pending” on marketing and other informational material, you can’t sue for infringement based solely on a provisional application. You do not have legally enforceable patent rights against infringers until a patent is granted based on a non-provisional application.

Using the term “patent pending” as I described, though, can be a deterrent to infringement. That phrase does make people aware that a subsequent non-provisional application may be filed and published, at which point they may be found to have actual legal notice of potential patent rights. That could leave them liable for infringement retroactive to the publication date if a patent eventually issues from the non-provisional application.

Here's What to Do

Use the provisional application to secure your filing date, and work with a patent professional to do it correctly to maximize the chances of your full non-provisional application being granted as a patent that protects what you want it to protect.

Also, do use the term “patent pending” as I described, as that can be a deterrent to infringement. That phrase does make people aware that a subsequent non-provisional application may be filed and published, at which point they may be found to have actual legal notice of potential patent rights. That could leave them liable for infringement retroactive to the publication date if a patent eventually issues from the non-provisional application.

If you’d like help with a patent, let’s talk. You can use my contact form or book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on patents and other intellectual property and business law issues.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Your Content Deal Has Claws

What Coca-Cola Did to Johnny Cash — And Why Every Creator Should Be Terrified

Last November, the Johnny Cash estate sued Coca-Cola for using a tribute singer specifically chosen to sound like the Man in Black, without permission, without a license, without paying a single cent. Sound familiar? It should. Frito-Lay tried the exact same thing with Tom Waits in 1992 and lost two and a half million dollars. Brands have been stealing artists’ voices, content, and identities for decades. And it’s not just celebrities at risk. If you’re a creator signing brand deals, or a business hiring influencers, your contracts may be doing the same thing right now without you realizing it. I’m Julie King, a patent and IP attorney with over 25 years of experience, and today we’re talking about the three legal traps hiding in almost every influencer and marketing contract.

AI and Your Lawyer

AI Tools and Attorney-Client Privilege: What the Heppner Decision Means for You

Here is the AI and privacy issue that is not getting enough attention: AI meeting transcription tools.
Also, there is a federal court decision from earlier this year that has been generating a lot of conversation in legal circles, and a lot of confusion. If you have seen headlines like “court rules AI chats are not privileged” or “your AI conversations can be used against you,” here is the accurate version of what actually happened and what it means for you.
What about your attorney using AI? Here’s what you need to know.