Myth: “A Provisional Patent Application Gives Me a Patent”

#1 of 5 Common Misconceptions About Provisional Patent Applications

Nope! A provisional patent application is not a patent. Based on inventor questions I see on Reddit and Quora, inventors should have to write this on the whiteboard 100 times before filing a provisional patent application.

Here's the Truth

A provisional patent application is essentially a temporary filing that holds your place in line at the USPTO for 12 months. To get an actual patent, you must file a non-provisional application before that year runs out. The USPTO does NOT examine your provisional application, and it will never result in a patent on its own.

While a provisional application establishes an early filing priority date for your invention and allows you to use “patent pending” on marketing and other informational material, you can’t sue for infringement based solely on a provisional application. You do not have legally enforceable patent rights against infringers until a patent is granted based on a non-provisional application.

Using the term “patent pending” as I described, though, can be a deterrent to infringement. That phrase does make people aware that a subsequent non-provisional application may be filed and published, at which point they may be found to have actual legal notice of potential patent rights. That could leave them liable for infringement retroactive to the publication date if a patent eventually issues from the non-provisional application.

Here's What to Do

Use the provisional application to secure your filing date, and work with a patent professional to do it correctly to maximize the chances of your full non-provisional application being granted as a patent that protects what you want it to protect.

Also, do use the term “patent pending” as I described, as that can be a deterrent to infringement. That phrase does make people aware that a subsequent non-provisional application may be filed and published, at which point they may be found to have actual legal notice of potential patent rights. That could leave them liable for infringement retroactive to the publication date if a patent eventually issues from the non-provisional application.

If you’d like help with a patent, let’s talk. You can use my contact form or book a consultation online at kingpatentlaw.com or by calling my office at 312-596-2222 or 217-714-8558.

Please check out the other posts and pages on my website for more information on patents and other intellectual property and business law issues.

Picture of Julie King

Julie King

Julie is a licensed patent attorney and the founding attorney at King Patent Law, PLLC, with over 25 years of legal experience. Her practice focuses on intellectual property, business, and estate planning, and she's passionate about helping clients use IP tools to protect and grow their businesses. When she's not helping clients, you can find her at a live rock show, watching a horror movie, or playing the guitar (badly).
.libutton { display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; padding: 7px; text-align: center; outline: none; text-decoration: none !important; color: #ffffff !important; width: 14rem; height: 2.5rem; border-radius: 16px; background-color: #0A66C2; font-family: "SF Pro Text", Helvetica, sans-serif; } Follow Julie on LinkedIn

This content is for informational and educational purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. For advice about your specific situation, consult with a licensed attorney.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

More Posts

Categories

Recent Posts

Applications Decoded

Tales from the Crypt(ic Requirements): Trademark Specimens and Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications Decoded

Thinking about filing a trademark before you launch? Intent-to-Use applications and specimen requirements are more complex than they appear. Patent attorney Julie King explains what goes wrong and why trademark attorney guidance matters. You’ve got a great brand name. Maybe you’ve designed a logo. You’re getting ready to launch your business or product. But here’s the question everyone asks: Should you wait until you’re actually selling products to file for a trademark? Or can you file now and secure your rights before launch?

Trump trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

Current Events: Trump Trademarks and the Domestic Emoluments Clause

How Trump Business Ownership of Airport Trademarks Would Violate the Domestic Emoluments Clause: How does the Domestic Emoluments Clause apply to these trademark applications? Who names airports? That’s right, Congress does, for airports under federal jurisdiction, and the states do for state-owned airports.
Trump has asked for the Palm Beach International Airport and Dulles International Airport to be named after him. Given that these applications also cover airport construction, it’s not a leap to think there may be future airports Trump wants to be named “DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT” and/or “PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT,” especially if the proposed renaming of the Palm Beach and Dulles airports doesn’t happen. Note that the trademarks for the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport are owned by the public entity that runs the airport, Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Federal Agency Assignee of United States (D.C. Body Politic and Corporate) ), NOT a private company.